Hard decisions – what to bring??

Everytime when I go away on any trip, no matter how long or how short, there is the ultimate question to be answered; what camera gear do I bring along? It’s impossible to bring it all, as I have too many lenses really but I am always afraid I am taking the wrong ones. So I need your help in answering this for the upcoming trip to Cambodia and Laos. I’m thinking it is not gonna be a wildlife trip, so my heaviest lens (100-400mm) can stay at home. But then comes the difficult part; which of the allrounders to bring? 24-105 f4.0 or the 24-70 2.8? I have been browsing through my photos taken when we were in Indonesia a couple of years ago and checked which lens I actually used the most.

Taken with the 24-105 at 105mm

Taken with the 24-105 at 105mm

Ofcourse I did not have the 24-70 at the time so I cannot really compare it but I can safely say that I used the 24-105 most. Out of the 1000 images I checked I shot 732 images with this lens and only 265 with the 70-200mm 2.8 IS. I looooove that lens but it is heavy and bulky and so I think that is gonna be a no go. I would bring it if I new there was going to be a lot of wildlife in either of the countries but my guess is not..

This would not have been possible without the use of the 70-200!!

This would not have been possible without the use of the 70-200!!

For markets and general scenes the 24-105 is fine. The only drawback is that it is a F4.0 and not an 2.8 but it seems silly to bring both as they have the same range. The plus for the 24-70mm is the fact that you can get in much closer. It focusses at a closer range then the 24-105 plus it is a f2.8. But for now… I think it makes no sense to bring both just for that.

Wow, so that is only one lens sofar…. Then a definite yes is the 50mm 1.4. This will be perfect for late at night stuff without flash. So that is a ticked box. I could bring also the 85mm 1.8, but not sure yet. I guess it depends on what else I will bring (but if I take the 50mm 1.4 then the 85mm will stay home). The 100mm macro will definitely stay home. I brought it with me to Indonesia and used it for the grand total of one image, so that is not worth the carrying around!

For the first time I am only bringing memorycards with me and nothing to download them to. I used to bring a tiny laptop to save all the images I’d taken but since the cost of memory cards has gone down considerably I got a few 32Gb SD cards which will last me for three weeks for sure. So that saves a lot in weight as well. No extra chargers needed etc. Just a tiny memory card box… :)

So I guess the conclusion is I am taking the 24-105 f4.0 and the 50 mm1.4.

What would you bring??

Comments

  1. Hey – just saw your post, just after scrolling through my friend’s photoshoot in Cambodia from her trip few weeks ago. Maybe I could put you in touch with her – I am sure she would not mind that as she is very passionate about her photography and take stunning photos. So, she might have an idea. I will perhaps send her a link on facebook about your blog and if she finds time she can hop over she could comment here with her opinion. HAve a fabulous time – her pics were great !!!!!

    • Thanks Ilze. I guess in the end it comes down to the photos I like to shoot but since the range of subjects I want to be able to shoot is always bigger then the amount of space in my photo backpack, it involves choices… ;) Hard choices. But yes, it’s always good to hear from someone who has just been there!

  2. Hi Simone, oh yes, these questions sound somehow familair to me. When I went last year to Guernsey for hiking/walking I took following lenses with me: 50mm f1.4 , 17-40 mm f 4.0 and the 70-200mm f4.0 without IS (so that this has a very handy size in contrast to the f2.8) and I was very satisfied with this combination.
    But maybe it is aso an idea for you to bring a 1.4 converter with you as well??

    • I checked yesterday on the 1.4 converter hoping it would fit on my 24-105 or even the 24-70 but it doesn’t. It will go on the 70-200 or my 100-400 but then again that is just not so very useful. :( Since I do love portraits I might still take the 70-200 but you’re right the f4.0 is a lot lighter. I just want to not carry too much gear around for a change… !

  3. Pelin Guven says:

    Hi Simone,this is Ilze’s friend, Pelin. I sometimes wish i could have this apparatus installed on my eyes that could change to whatever lens and to whatever f stop and to whatever zoom I need -in that particular situation in an instant!:) Well, very good to meet you! I would take exactly those both lenses you’ve decided to take. My 50mm 1.4 and I are inseparable…A wide lens is great for the magical architecture of temples.. Before I take any trip my dilemma has always been whether to take my bulky manfrotto tripod or not..Unless I want to take night shots with long exposure, in the end I leave it home..I wish you have a wonderful time photographing! Bon voyage!

    • Thanks so much Pelin.. :) I never take my tripod as it is just too heavy and bulky and the smaller ones tend to be pretty useless I always think… Good to know you’re choice of lens is mine too!

  4. Oh, that’s a pity. I just double checked with my Kenko converter (http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B003VN781M/ref=oh_details_o00_s00_i00) and this works as well with the 24-105 as with the 24-70. Of course, you loose one aperture but autofocus is still fine. My boyfriend just bought the 24-70 via ebay so that I am now the happy tester ;-) ….. lol

    • Ooooo, now i just have to get one of those kenko converters! I was looking for something like that but couldn’t find it so thanks for the tip! That will solve all issues! And save on packing too…:) I already located where to buy it!

Speak Your Mind

*